Betekenis van:
system error

Voorbeeldzinnen

1. First part of the plea: error of assessment of the Spanish tax system vitiating the finding that the disputed measures do not confer any advantage on agricultural cooperatives
2. Any delayed, ambiguous or uncertain system response may be misinterpreted or taken as an error by the system or by the driver, and may lead to the driver making a second input.
3. Any delayed, ambiguous or uncertain system response may be misinterpreted, may be taken as an error by the system or by the driver, and may lead to the driver making a second input.
4. Each NCB shall comply with, and ensure that its respective national RTGS system complies with the error handling procedures adopted by the Governing Council of the ECB. The ECB shall ensure the same for the ECB payment mechanism.
5. Second part of the plea: error of assessment that the disputed measures are in keeping with the nature and scheme of the Spanish tax system vitiating the finding of an absence of selectivity in relation to these measures
6. Hybrid Inertial Navigation Systems embedded with Global Navigation Satellite Systems(s) (GNSS) or with "Data-Based Referenced Navigation" ("DBRN") System(s) for navigation, attitude, guidance or control, subsequent to normal alignment and having an INS navigation position accuracy, after loss of GNSS or "DBRN" for a period of up to four minutes, of less (better) than 10 metres "Circular Error Probable" (CEP);
7. Hybrid Inertial Navigation Systems embedded with Global Navigation Satellite Systems(s) (GNSS) or with "Data-Based Referenced Navigation" ("DBRN") System(s) for attitude, guidance or control, subsequent to normal alignment, having an INS navigation position accuracy, after loss of GNSS or "DBRN" for a period of up to four minutes, of less (better) than 10 metres 'Circular Error Probable' (CEP).
8. Where the management and control system is common to a number of similar operational programmes, for example for the same Fund, in accordance with Article 71(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006, a single sample guaranteeing the same technical parameters of confidence and materiality levels and taking into account the same expected rate of error, as indicated above, may be selected for all programmes together.
9. If it is found that applications and/or declarations presented by an importer to the competent authorities of a Member State are false, misleading or inaccurate, unless they are clearly due to a genuine error, the competent authorities of the Member States concerned shall exclude the importer in question from the licence applications system for the next application period as referred to in Article 8(2).’;
10. Where it is found that a document submitted by an applicant in accordance with paragraph 4 provides false information and where such information is decisive for the attribution of preferential import licences, the competent authorities of the Member States shall exclude the applicant from the licence application system for the current and following marketing year, unless the applicant proves, to the satisfaction of the competent authority, that this is not due to his gross negligence or that it is due to force majeure or to obvious error.
11. TECHNICAL PARAMETERS FOR RANDOM STATISTICAL SAMPLING PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 17 (SAMPLING) 1. A random statistical sampling method allows conclusions to be drawn from the results of audits of the sample on the overall expenditure from which the sample was taken, and hence provides evidence to obtain assurance on the functioning of the management and control systems. 2. The assurance provided on the functioning of the systems is determined by the degree of confidence resulting from the conclusions of the system audits and from the audits of operations in the sample selected by a random statistical sampling method. In order to obtain a high level of assurance, that is, a reduced audit risk, the audit authority should combine the results of system audits and audits of operations. The audit authority first evaluates the reliability of the systems (high, average or low) taking into account the results of systems audits, so as to determine the technical parameters of the sampling, in particular the confidence level and the expected error rate.